Darwinism exposed-'First Cell That Formed by Chance''

Harun  Yahya

.....:::::::::: Articles ::::::::::.....

Harun  Yahya

Genome Research Is Demolishing the ''First Cell That Formed by Chance'' Claim

The theory of evolution maintains, on the basis of no scientific foundation whatsoever, that at a time when there was still no life on Earth, inanimate substances came together to give rise to the first living organism. According to this evolutionist claim, the first living organism must have had a sufficiently simple structure to have been able to form by chance.

The fact is, however, that Darwinists ARE UNABLE TO ACCOUNT FOR HOW EVEN A SINGLE PROTEIN EMERGED.

The fact that a single protein cannot form spontaneously is one that in any case totally demolishes the theory of evolution. But even if we assume for a moment that this impossibility did actually come about, we still see that the “primitive cell” claimed by Darwinists eliminates with absolutely certain proofs the possibility of life coming into being spontaneously. Data provided by science in the 21st century shows that even the life form with the very simplest structure is in fact highly complex, and that it is practically impossible for it to emerge spontaneously and by chance.

Genome research supplies this information. Based on the idea that living things with the smallest genome (extremophiles and eubacteria) have the least complexity, scientists have calculated the probabilities of these organisms appearing by chance and spontaneously. Another point needing clarification here is this: scientists also regard these organisms as the oldest life forms on Earth.

Genome research revealed that the lowest number of proteins required for life was between 250 and 450.[1]In other words, the minimum number of different proteins that would have to combine together at the same time in order to give rise to the structural features of the cell and performs its basic functions is between 250 and 450.

It also needs to be made clear that this minimum number of 250-450 protein is the number of proteins obtained from microbes living parasitically. The minimum number of proteins needed in order for an organism to live independently of another is around 1500. In other words, Darwinists have to account for the separate existence of 1500 different proteins needed to give rise to a single functioning cell. But, to reiterate, Darwinists are unable to account for the emergence of even a single protein.

It is totally impossible for between 250 and 1500 different proteins required for an organism to be considered as living to form spontaneously and at the same time. Probability calculations on the subject are given in the following table:

Minimum Protein Number[2]

Probability of Emerging Simultaneously

250

1018,750

350

1026,250

500

1037,500

1,500

10112,500

1,900

10142,500


As the above table shows, the probability of a living organism with the least protein forming by chance is 1 in 1018,750. (In order to grasp the vast size of this number, it will be useful to remember that the total number of atoms in the universe is 1078.) In other words, there is no chance at all. Despite all these calculations and scientific data, evolutionists still insist on believing in the impossible. The sole reason for that insistence is their determination to deny the existence of Almighty Allah, Who created all things out of nothing.

Morowitz’s probability calculation

The probability calculations cited above are in agreement with a calculation by the biophysicist Harold Morowitz. He assumed he had broken all the chemical bonds in the E. coli bacterium and released all the atoms comprising it, and then calculated the probability of these atoms spontaneously recombining to give rise to the E. coli once again. In this theoretical experiment, all the atoms required are present in all the appropriate quantities, and it is assumed that no other atom can become involved from the outside. Nonetheless, he calculated that the chances of all the atoms coming together spontaneously in a specific order, despite their being in the appropriate numbers and in an appropriate environment, in such a way as to produce an E. coli bacterium was 1 in 10100,000,000,000.[3]This goes far beyond being merely impossible. Such a number reveals the impossibility of even the least complex organism in the universe forming by chance, even if all the conditions and materials are brought together.

A sufficient number of proteins combining together is not sufficient for life to emerge

Let us imagine we have all the proteins necessary for life ready to hand. The existence of these proteins, which cannot come about in this way, IS NOT ENOUGH FOR EVEN A SINGLE CELL TO FORM. Microbiologists and biochemists explicitly say that the organization of these proteins within the cell is also highly important, otherwise the proteins will serve no purpose. Moreover, as Darwinist scientists know full well, the cell possesses organelles that manufacture proteins and a glorious DNA data bank far more complex than proteins. A living cell is made possible by all these structures possessing the same function and organization at the same time, and acting with the same consciousness. This is a fact that demolishes Darwinism.

The fact that bacteria possess an extraordinary internal organization was unknown until the 1990s. The fact is, however, that the complex cells (eukaryotic) comprising single-cell protozoans are known to be made up of a nucleus, organelles, membrane systems, a cytoskeleton, several internal sections and other contents organizing the content of the cell on the molecular level.[4]All these systems are extraordinarily complex. One cannot function independently of the others.

Conclusion

As the information provided here shows, microbiology, biochemistry and genome research, all the main scientific advances in the second half of the 20th century and the 21st century in short, have eradicated all the claims of the theory of evolution. These scientific conclusions have revealed that Darwinism is totally unscientific and consists of claims that are far removed from science. Science has refuted evolutionist claims regarding “a very simple fist living organism.” Aside from the minimum number of proteins and minimum complexity needed for it to be alive, an organism is too complex to be explained by evolutionist claims of chance and possesses a perfect organization. In addition to all this complexity, the existence of a single cell brings the theory of evolution to a complete halt.

It is an evident fact that life came into being from nothing with the infinite intelligence, knowledge and might of Allah. This fact, obvious to reason and good conscience, is also corroborated by countless scientific data today.

The following is revealed in the Qur’an about our Lord’s matchless Creation:

[Allah is] the Originator of the heavens and earth. When He decides on something, He just says to it, “Be!” and it is. (Surat al-Baqara, 117)


[1]Jack Maniloff, “The Minimal Cell Genome:’On Being the Right Size’,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93 81996), pp. 10004-10006; Mitsuhiro Itaya, “An Estimation of Minimal Genome Size Required for Life,” FEBS Letters 362 (1995), pp 257-260; Rana and Ross, Origins of Life, p. 163
[2]Rana and Ross, Origins of Life, p. 163
[3]Robert Shapiro, Origins: A Skeptic’s Guide to Creation of Life on Earth (New York:Bantam Books, 1986), p. 128; Rana and Ross, Origins of Life, p. 164
[4]Lucy Shapiro and Richard Losick, “Protein Localization and Cell Fate in Bacteria,” Science 276 (1997), pp.712-718; Rana and Ross, Origins of Life, p. 166

May 28, 2010



Harun Yahya -  Articles Click for All Articles
Please write your comment for this work
Comments For This Work
URIM AHMETAJ (student) - 06.06.2010 22:10:50
Allahu ju a shperblefte . E shkaterrove komplet darvinizmin semundjen me te keqe qe ekziston . Allahu ta shperblefte me xhehenet
Click to All Comments
Post To MySpace! Share To FriendFeed


Other Languages
Türkçe


.....:::::::::: Related Works ::::::::::.....

Books

The Evolution Impasse II The Evolution Impasse I

Web Sites

Darwinists in a Pinch Cambrian and Darwin

Articles

The glorious irreducible complexity in the synthesis of a single protein How can Dawkins explain the perfect eye in our brains?
Stop lying! Darwinists: ''We apologize once again, we were also mistaken about Ardi''
The angels were not created through evolution

Daily Comments

Evolutionists cannot explain the altruism in spermaceti whales The angels were not created through evolution
.....:::::::::: Related Works in Same Category ::::::::::.....

1,5 million year old footprints is a brand new, shocking, severe blow to the imaginary evolution A 155-million-year-old squid
A 165-million-year-old fossil spider found in China A 24 million year old fossil, shows bees have never changed
A fossil discovered in Georgia has once again overturned Darwinist myths ''Aggrieved Darwin'' propaganda is a trick
A historical lie: The Stone Age - I A historical lie: The Stone Age - II
Allah (God) breathed his spirit into man Allah has created the world people watch in a space no bigger than a lentil
All philosophies constructed on the basis of matter is collapsed A Muslim who believes in evolution does not leave the faith, but believes in a deception that science has disproved
An 84-million-year-old seal skull that demolishes the 'ancestor of the seal' deception Ancient Egypt: a magnificent civilization - I
Ancient Egypt: a magnificent civilization - II A new name for Darwinist despair modular evolution and a perfect flying bird: Darwinopterus
Another twisted belief with the same logic as Darwinism has now appeared: ''Fakewinism'' Answers to some allegations about the fact of matter
Archaeopteryx is a perfect flying bird A reply to Andya Primanda
A response to a pro-evolution program on Dem TV and the Darwinist nonsense on it A response to Yigit Bulut's claim that 'you cannot explain what was before the big bang nor link that to the big bang'
A second embarrassing Ardi case for Darwinists: Australopithecus Sediba A whale fantasy from National Geographic
Behaving like hooligans instead of science is all Darwinists can do Belief in creation is spreading across the entire world!
Celal Sengor is right! Darwinism was founded on a momentous lie Charles Darwin's twisted views that regarded everyone apart from Caucasians as ''anthropomorphous apes and lower race''
Coelacanth is not a transitional form, it is a perfect deep-water fish Common material, design and designer
Darwinism - basis of atheist ideologies - being in agony is one of the portents of the return of Jesus (pbuh) Darwinism has been annihilated across the world
Darwinism is not science. It is a shamanistic religion that has adopted nature as a deity! Darwinism is the ideological basis of Satanism
Darwinism is the religion of the antichrist – 1 Darwinism's contradiction with religion
Darwinism's unscientific formula Darwinism: The worst so-called scientific deception - 1
Darwinism: The worst so-called scientific deception - 2 Darwinist panic in Switzerland!
Darwinist publications are now admitting the harm done to the world by Darwinist corruption Darwinists are in dismay!
Darwinists are in mourning in France Darwinists are still trying to depict defunct Darwinism as scientific
Darwinists' ''Artificial Life'' Deception Darwinists' claims that Darwinism's saying 'we come from apes' is an oversimplification
Darwinists 'common ancestor' deception Darwinists' confessions about mutations and the words of scientists
Darwinists' confessions about the mutations Darwinists could not speculate on the flying fish
Darwinists could not speculate on the hand fish Darwinists could not speculate on the platypus
Darwinists' efforts to cover up living fossils is fraudulent Darwinists, fire at will!
Darwinists' greatest embarrassment on the agenda: Pointless efforts to keep the myth of whale evolution alive Darwinists' great shame over their claims of chance
Darwinists have also failed to deceive people over the Neanderthals Darwinists in shock! ''We were wrong; T. Rex is also not a transitional fossil!''
Darwinists insistently do not like the imaginary ancestor of humans, which they fabricated, to be called “ape” Darwinists' latest desperate efforts to keep the Dino-bird deception alive
Darwinists misrepresentations about human genome project Darwinists never realize -1-
Darwinists never realize -2- Darwinists now raise their hopes by importing pagan priests from America
Darwinists regard foreign journals as sacred Darwinists risking humiliation over their speculation on a single fossil pinky finger
Darwinists' shameful scenarios about supposed human evolution: MSNBC still imagines it can deceive people Darwinists' Swiss defeat in photos
Darwinists: 'We admit it... The story of bird evolution is a lie!' Darwinists: ''We apologize once again, we were also mistaken about Ardi''
Darwinists: ''We confess, Ida is not a transitional form, it is a complete and perfect living being!'' (but, when did they confess this? Right after Harun Yahya revealed their lies.) Darwin's legacy confirmed on the 200th anniversary of his birth
Dawkins has taken the bait Dawkins is aware that he was defeated; He is presenting excuses not to meet with Mr. Adnan Oktar
Dawkins is desperately trying to deceive young children Dawkins is no more Darwinist! He converted to space religion!
Dawkins! You can't reach a point by debating priests Deceptions regarding prion proteins will not save despairing Darwinists
Despairing Darwinists place their hopes in heat Devout Christians should pose these questions to the pope
Douglas Futuyma flees in Rome Evolutionist despotism in the United States
Evolution surveys in Europe under the control of the Darwinist dictatorship Evolution surveys under the monopoly of the Darwinist dictatorship
Evolution Theory Cannot Explain How Life Originated Fifteen proofs that disprove Darwin on the 200th anniversary of his birth
Haeckel's embryo drawings are fraudulent Homo Floresiensis and the facts emerging about the evolution myth
How can Dawkins explain the perfect eye in our brains? How was Tiktaalik roseae turned into a false intermediate fossil by Darwinists?
Important developments regarding Flores man Important subjects that were never mentioned on the program 'Siyaset Meydani' (political arena)
Important supplementary information Is the Belgian RTBF channel under pressure from the Darwinist dictatorship?
Is the Darwinist global mafia threatening the pope? Materialism: The superstition of an age
Misconceptions about the human genome project Mosaic evolution deceit
National Geographic's Darwin error New fossil discovery sinks evolutionary theories
Nightmare of Dawkins Obstacles to transition from water to land
Photos of Dawkins while researching on animal world! Pikaia is a perfect Cambrian living thing. Claiming that it is a transitional form fossil is a deception
'Piltdown man' was a hoax Present-day Darwinists are making the same error as that of pharaoh in the past
Protein cannot form unless the cell exists as an integral whole Quantum physics: The Discovery that scientifically demolished materialism
Random mutations destroy life and cannot produce mutually compatible organs Richard Dawkins' and daily Hürriyet's ignorance
Richard Dawkins is wising up! Scientific American’s 15 errors
Scientific responses to Celal Sengor's demagogic claims Scientists are embarrassed by the Ida circus
Some advice for Min0e G. Kırıkkanat Stop lying!
The angels were not created through evolution The attempt to equate Islam with evolution is a passive, helpless, defeatist and meaningless one
The bans that cannot be breached in universities The claim that archaeopteryx is the ancestor of birds is a deception
The claim that 'Australopithecus is the ancestor of man' is fraudulent The claim that ''natural selection causes evolution'' is a fraudulent one
The claim that 'natural selection makes conscious selection' is one of the worst frauds in history The claim that 'Neanderthals are the ape-like ancestors of man' is fraudulent
The coelacanth that evolutionists claim as a transitional form is living in the seas as a perfect life form The concealment of Cambrian fossils for 70 years is a deception
The Darwinist deception of ''The number of chromosomes declined from 48 to 46'' The Darwinist dictatorship is collapsing!
The Darwinist techniques of clamor and demagoguery The deceit that photosynthetic bacteria emerged with 'a small evolution' and produced oxygen
The deceit that the human ability to think is the same as that of other living things The deception regarding mutations
The deception that therapsids are transiitional forms The deception that 'there are tons of transitional fossils and that dinosaur species represent transitional fossils'
The deception that there was no oxygen in the primeval atmosphere The end of the Darwinist dictatorship: the second coming of Jesus (pbuh) has come close
The error of seeking to depict the harmony on earth as disorder The evolutionary myth, from ancient Greece to modern Europe
The evolution deceit The evolutionist claim of a transition from water to land is a lie, Tiktaalik Roseae: Another missing link myth
The evolutionist tradition of concealing fossils The evolutionist tradition of concealing fossils general / 2008-08-30
The evolution of the horse series is a fraud The fall of atheism
The five essential conditions for protein formation The fossil record refutes evolution
The fundamental philosophy of atheist freemasonry: Darwinism -1- The glorious irreducible complexity in the synthesis of a single protein
The guardian: Darwinism in Britain has collapsed! The idea that Darwin made an important scientific discovery after his voyages is a deception
The idea that 'mutations cause evolution' is a falsehood The idea that the 'coelacanth is an example of the transition from sea to land' is a fraud
The ignored sickness: An unpredictable state of mind The images visualized and dreams
The importance of the intellectual struggle against Darwinism The invalidity of the claims that the eye is not an irreducibly complex structure and that the eye evolved
The invalidity of the claim that bacterial resistance to antibiotics is evidence of evolution The invalidity of the claim that man's ancestors lived in caves
The invalidity of the claim that mutations miraculously give rise to evolution The invalidity of the claim that new species evolve every year
The invalidity of the claim that the idea that whales evolved from bears did not originate with Darwin The invalidity of the claim that there is chaos in the universe and the world
The latest Darwinist manoeuvrings are of no avail as objections to Darwinism in Britain rise The latest developments regarding Flores man
The myth of bird evolution The origins of superstitious religion of Darwinism
The pitiful Darwinists who imagine the newly discovered fossil Anchiornis Huxleyi to be a transitional fossil The question Darwinism and materialism will never be able to answer: what is the origin of life?
The real face of Charles Darwin who is introduced to the public as a 'scientist' The Repairer DNA Precludes Evolutionists' Mutation Scenarios
The scientific collapse of materialism The theory of evolution: a unique deception in the history of the world
The transition to bipedalism deception The true facts about the fictitious 'missing link' Ida that Darwinists never mention
The truth that Darwinist bus posters confess: Darwinism = Atheism The Vatican conference is anti-democratic
The Vatican has surrendered to Darwinists The vestigial organ deception has once again been refuted by scientists
The wave-like properties of the electron and the scientific proof The widening genetic gap
Those who ascribe equals to Allah will encounter the horror in their minds in the hereafter To be dedicated to Dawkins
Unable to Account for a Single Protein, Darwinists Now Place Their Hopes in Fossilized Footprints USA - Slate Magazine: Meet Harun Yahya : the leading creationist in the Muslim world
USA - The Boston Globe: In the Muslim world, creationism is on the rise We challenge Dawkins to a discussion before the public
What Darwinists claimed, what happened What Darwinists said, what happened then
What will Dawkins have to say to this? Londoners say 'we support creation' Why are Darwinists reluctant to confront Mr. Adnan Oktar?
Why are Darwinists so determined to humiliate themselves? Why are Darwinists still resorting to false Dino-bird myths?
Why do Darwinists not give up? Why do defenders of creation who say the earth is 4.5 billion years old disturb Darwinists so much?
Why is anti-Darwinist activity so important? Yet another blow to the myth of vestigial organs

BookGlobal.Net

No comments:

Post a Comment