The pitiful Darwinists and fossil Anchiornis Huxleyi

Harun  Yahya

.....:::::::::: Articles ::::::::::.....

Harun  Yahya

The pitiful Darwinists who imagine the newly discovered fossil Anchiornis Huxleyi to be a transitional fossil

A fossil discovered in China the other day was quickly taken up as a “four-winged bird” in the Darwinist media. Darwinists right away claimed that this fossil might be “the ancestor of birds.” As ever, they immediately gave the animal a name. They baptized it Anchiornis huxleyi, in memory of Thomas Huxley, an atheist, Darwinist and 32nd degree freemason known as Darwin’s bulldog.

The fossil belonged to a bird, with wings and also feathers on its hind legs. The fossil, which Darwinists were unable to account for, also conflicted with the claims of the theory of evolution. As we know, despite being a perfect bird Archaeopteryx is regarded as a transitional form by Darwinists making childish claims. (You can read about the scientific evidence showing that Archaeopteryx is a perfect bird here and here.) This new fossil, found in strata dating back 151-161 million years, was older than Archaeopteryx. But from the Darwinist perspective it exhibited no imaginary transitional form characteristics that it needed to go to Archaeopteryx. With its “four wings,” as Darwinists described it, this life form represent a huge puzzle in terms of Darwinist theory. As they strive to account for the supposed evolution of two wings, Darwinists now have to account for third and fourth wings not observed in dinosaurs, nor flying squirrels nor birds. This of course deals a profound and severe blow to the Darwinist claim of evolution from bipedal dinosaurs. For that reason Darwinists began talking about a transitional form “whose rear wing-like structures gradually became vestigial.” Not even able to account for the two wings possessed by birds, they now began defending the idea “two pairs of wings that formed in some way and then became vestigial for some reason.”But that account is nothing less than an expression of despair.

Anchiornis Huxleyi Is Not a Transitional Fossil But a Species of Bird Like Those Living Today

Despite all the Darwinist speculation, it appears from even a brief examination of the Anchiornis Huxleyi fossil that it represents a species of bird similar to those living today. The fossil in question exhibits fully avian features in terms of skull and general anatomy. In terms of its wings and feathers, it appears to resemble the today’s species of birds with muffed feet. In addition to wings, these animals have feathers strongly reminiscent of wings on their back legs. The feathers in question do not function as wings, but are important in giving the animal an impressive appearance.

This approximately 160-million-year-old life form possesses the same features as present-day birds with muffed feet. It represents an extinct member of the species that comprise this family. This is so obvious that any scientist looking at pictures of it will easily see this clear resemblance.

As we have already seen, in order to be able to suggest that this fossil resembles a transitional form, Darwinists maintain that the rear feathers that pose such a dilemma for their theory gradually became “vestigial.” What this means, according to the theory of evolution is: “A dinosaur gradually decided to fly, following which it developed a pair of wings. It then thought another pair of wings would come in handy and grew those, too. But as it grew this second pair it then thought they were actually unnecessary. It finally decided these wings should become vestigial and disappear and continued its imaginary evolutionary process with just one pair of wings.” That, in summary, is the fairy tale that Darwinists are telling, dressed up in scientific terminology, in world-renowned journals. The points in this extraordinarily illogical scenario, which not even a child would be taken in by, that represent insoluble dilemmas for Darwinists are as follows:

- There is no such thing as a transition from dinosaurs to birds. Such a passage is physiologically impossible and, naturally, THERE EXISTS NOT A SINGLE TRANSITIONAL FOSSIL that might confirm this impossible scenario.

- Birds did not emerge from some other life form gliding through the air. Birds have always existed as birds, and appeared suddenly with their magnificent appearances. As with all other life forms, THERE EXISTS NOT A SINGLE TRANSITIONAL FOSSIL to show that birds evolved.

- Bird feathers and wings are some of the most complex structure investigated by biology today. It is totally ridiculous to claim that an unconscious life form decided these would be necessary, grew them and later gave up and allowed them to become vestigial. The proponents of Darwinism ARE IN AN IMPOSSIBLE POSITION IN THE FACE OF A SINGLE BIRD FEATHER.

- Four wings represent a considerable advantage for a living thing. Four-winged life forms can maneuver relatively much better than two-winged ones. For example, thanks to their four wings dragonflies and honeybees are able to maneuver very much easier. Four wings should therefore be an advantage for a life form. As we have seen, this illogical claim is even incompatible with evolution’s own claims.

- The animal HAS NOT A SINGLE STRUCTURE DEVELOPING FROM A MORE PRIMITIVE FORM that would allow it to be regarded as a transitional form. All of its structures are fully functional and sublimely complex.

- All the fossils put forward by Darwinists in order to supposedly confirm their scenarios of a passage from land to air, and that they still frequently attempt to bring up today, BELONG TO FULLY FORMED AND PREFECT LIFE FORMS. Since Archaeopteryx and Microraptor gui, another bird species with muffed feet, are nothing more than perfect bird species that existed millions of years ago, they cause grave concern to Darwinists, who have sought a way of escape from all the evidence of Creation by depicting them as transitional forms.

Darwinists are following the same course with the newly discovered fossil.

In the same way that every fossil discovered BELONGS TO A PERFECT LIFE FORM, so Anchiornis Huxleyi IS A PERFECT BIRD SPECIES that represents the highly decorative species of birds with muffed feet alive today and that has in all probability become extinct. And as a representative of birds with muffed feet that dates back 160 million years it constitutes significant evidence for Creation. A second important point here is that none of its organs exhibit any transitional form features.

Darwinists are engaging in the same offensive techniques with this new fossil that once again reveal their own helplessness. THEY ARE TRYING TO GATHER SUPPORT USING FALSE TECHNIQUES, by writing articles, holding conferences and disseminating the false idea this is a transitional form from the mouths of the most renowned Darwinist professors in the world’s best known journals. They have been doing the same thing for the last 150 years. They always try to deceive people with the same soiled propaganda and to impose the worst deception of the century on them using the same cunning stratagems. But the media are no longer suited to such things.

Darwinism HAS BEEN ENTIRELY ELIMINATED BY THE EXISTENCE OF 250 MILLION FOSSILS THAT ALL PROVE CREATION.

IT HAS BEEN SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN that the handful of fossils Darwinists claimed were SUPPOSEDLY TRANSITIONAL FORMS HAVE ALL BEEN INVALIDATED.

The Atlas of Creation HAS DECLARED TO THE WORLD THE FACT THAT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS EVOLUTION, a fact which Darwinists have tried to cover up for the last 150 years.

That is why nobody any longer listens or gives credence to these methods of deception that have persisted for the last 150 years.

And Darwinists are well aware of this. And that is the reason for their feelings of despair, misery and defeat.

Oct 03, 2009



Harun Yahya -  Articles Click for All Articles
Please write your comment for this work
Post To MySpace! Share To FriendFeed


Other Languages
Deutsch
Français
Español
Türkçe


.....:::::::::: Related Works ::::::::::.....

Articles

The five essential conditions for protein formation Darwinists could not speculate on the flying fish
The claim that 'natural selection makes conscious selection' is one of the worst frauds in history The vestigial organ deception has once again been refuted by scientists
Darwinists in shock! ''We were wrong; T. Rex is also not a transitional fossil!'' Darwinists could not speculate on the platypus
Present-day Darwinists are making the same error as that of pharaoh in the past Dawkins has taken the bait
Darwinists could not speculate on the hand fish Homo Floresiensis and the facts emerging about the evolution myth
Is the Belgian RTBF channel under pressure from the Darwinist dictatorship?
.....:::::::::: Related Works in Same Category ::::::::::.....

1,5 million year old footprints is a brand new, shocking, severe blow to the imaginary evolution A 155-million-year-old squid
A 165-million-year-old fossil spider found in China A 24 million year old fossil, shows bees have never changed
A fossil discovered in Georgia has once again overturned Darwinist myths ''Aggrieved Darwin'' propaganda is a trick
A historical lie: The Stone Age - I A historical lie: The Stone Age - II
Allah (God) breathed his spirit into man Allah has created the world people watch in a space no bigger than a lentil
All philosophies constructed on the basis of matter is collapsed A Muslim who believes in evolution does not leave the faith, but believes in a deception that science has disproved
An 84-million-year-old seal skull that demolishes the 'ancestor of the seal' deception Ancient Egypt: a magnificent civilization - I
Ancient Egypt: a magnificent civilization - II A new name for Darwinist despair modular evolution and a perfect flying bird: Darwinopterus
Another twisted belief with the same logic as Darwinism has now appeared: ''Fakewinism'' Answers to some allegations about the fact of matter
Archaeopteryx is a perfect flying bird A reply to Andya Primanda
A response to a pro-evolution program on Dem TV and the Darwinist nonsense on it A response to Yigit Bulut's claim that 'you cannot explain what was before the big bang nor link that to the big bang'
A second embarrassing Ardi case for Darwinists: Australopithecus Sediba A whale fantasy from National Geographic
Behaving like hooligans instead of science is all Darwinists can do Belief in creation is spreading across the entire world!
Celal Sengor is right! Darwinism was founded on a momentous lie Charles Darwin's twisted views that regarded everyone apart from Caucasians as ''anthropomorphous apes and lower race''
Coelacanth is not a transitional form, it is a perfect deep-water fish Common material, design and designer
Darwinism - basis of atheist ideologies - being in agony is one of the portents of the return of Jesus (pbuh) Darwinism has been annihilated across the world
Darwinism is not science. It is a shamanistic religion that has adopted nature as a deity! Darwinism is the ideological basis of Satanism
Darwinism is the religion of the antichrist – 1 Darwinism's contradiction with religion
Darwinism's unscientific formula Darwinism: The worst so-called scientific deception - 1
Darwinism: The worst so-called scientific deception - 2 Darwinist panic in Switzerland!
Darwinist publications are now admitting the harm done to the world by Darwinist corruption Darwinists are in dismay!
Darwinists are in mourning in France Darwinists are still trying to depict defunct Darwinism as scientific
Darwinists' ''Artificial Life'' Deception Darwinists' claims that Darwinism's saying 'we come from apes' is an oversimplification
Darwinists 'common ancestor' deception Darwinists' confessions about mutations and the words of scientists
Darwinists' confessions about the mutations Darwinists could not speculate on the flying fish
Darwinists could not speculate on the hand fish Darwinists could not speculate on the platypus
Darwinists' efforts to cover up living fossils is fraudulent Darwinists, fire at will!
Darwinists' greatest embarrassment on the agenda: Pointless efforts to keep the myth of whale evolution alive Darwinists' great shame over their claims of chance
Darwinists have also failed to deceive people over the Neanderthals Darwinists in shock! ''We were wrong; T. Rex is also not a transitional fossil!''
Darwinists insistently do not like the imaginary ancestor of humans, which they fabricated, to be called “ape” Darwinists' latest desperate efforts to keep the Dino-bird deception alive
Darwinists misrepresentations about human genome project Darwinists never realize -1-
Darwinists never realize -2- Darwinists now raise their hopes by importing pagan priests from America
Darwinists regard foreign journals as sacred Darwinists risking humiliation over their speculation on a single fossil pinky finger
Darwinists' shameful scenarios about supposed human evolution: MSNBC still imagines it can deceive people Darwinists' Swiss defeat in photos
Darwinists: 'We admit it... The story of bird evolution is a lie!' Darwinists: ''We apologize once again, we were also mistaken about Ardi''
Darwinists: ''We confess, Ida is not a transitional form, it is a complete and perfect living being!'' (but, when did they confess this? Right after Harun Yahya revealed their lies.) Darwin's legacy confirmed on the 200th anniversary of his birth
Dawkins has taken the bait Dawkins is aware that he was defeated; He is presenting excuses not to meet with Mr. Adnan Oktar
Dawkins is desperately trying to deceive young children Dawkins is no more Darwinist! He converted to space religion!
Dawkins! You can't reach a point by debating priests Deceptions regarding prion proteins will not save despairing Darwinists
Despairing Darwinists place their hopes in heat Devout Christians should pose these questions to the pope
Douglas Futuyma flees in Rome Evolutionist despotism in the United States
Evolution surveys in Europe under the control of the Darwinist dictatorship Evolution surveys under the monopoly of the Darwinist dictatorship
Evolution Theory Cannot Explain How Life Originated Fifteen proofs that disprove Darwin on the 200th anniversary of his birth
Genome Research Is Demolishing the ''First Cell That Formed by Chance'' Claim Haeckel's embryo drawings are fraudulent
Homo Floresiensis and the facts emerging about the evolution myth How can Dawkins explain the perfect eye in our brains?
How was Tiktaalik roseae turned into a false intermediate fossil by Darwinists? Important developments regarding Flores man
Important subjects that were never mentioned on the program 'Siyaset Meydani' (political arena) Important supplementary information
Is the Belgian RTBF channel under pressure from the Darwinist dictatorship? Is the Darwinist global mafia threatening the pope?
Materialism: The superstition of an age Misconceptions about the human genome project
Mosaic evolution deceit National Geographic's Darwin error
New fossil discovery sinks evolutionary theories Nightmare of Dawkins
Obstacles to transition from water to land Photos of Dawkins while researching on animal world!
Pikaia is a perfect Cambrian living thing. Claiming that it is a transitional form fossil is a deception 'Piltdown man' was a hoax
Present-day Darwinists are making the same error as that of pharaoh in the past Protein cannot form unless the cell exists as an integral whole
Quantum physics: The Discovery that scientifically demolished materialism Random mutations destroy life and cannot produce mutually compatible organs
Richard Dawkins' and daily Hürriyet's ignorance Richard Dawkins is wising up!
Scientific American’s 15 errors Scientific responses to Celal Sengor's demagogic claims
Scientists are embarrassed by the Ida circus Some advice for Min0e G. Kırıkkanat
Stop lying! The angels were not created through evolution
The attempt to equate Islam with evolution is a passive, helpless, defeatist and meaningless one The bans that cannot be breached in universities
The claim that archaeopteryx is the ancestor of birds is a deception The claim that 'Australopithecus is the ancestor of man' is fraudulent
The claim that ''natural selection causes evolution'' is a fraudulent one The claim that 'natural selection makes conscious selection' is one of the worst frauds in history
The claim that 'Neanderthals are the ape-like ancestors of man' is fraudulent The coelacanth that evolutionists claim as a transitional form is living in the seas as a perfect life form
The concealment of Cambrian fossils for 70 years is a deception The Darwinist deception of ''The number of chromosomes declined from 48 to 46''
The Darwinist dictatorship is collapsing! The Darwinist techniques of clamor and demagoguery
The deceit that photosynthetic bacteria emerged with 'a small evolution' and produced oxygen The deceit that the human ability to think is the same as that of other living things
The deception regarding mutations The deception that therapsids are transiitional forms
The deception that 'there are tons of transitional fossils and that dinosaur species represent transitional fossils' The deception that there was no oxygen in the primeval atmosphere
The end of the Darwinist dictatorship: the second coming of Jesus (pbuh) has come close The error of seeking to depict the harmony on earth as disorder
The evolutionary myth, from ancient Greece to modern Europe The evolution deceit
The evolutionist claim of a transition from water to land is a lie, Tiktaalik Roseae: Another missing link myth The evolutionist tradition of concealing fossils
The evolutionist tradition of concealing fossils general / 2008-08-30 The evolution of the horse series is a fraud
The fall of atheism The five essential conditions for protein formation
The fossil record refutes evolution The fundamental philosophy of atheist freemasonry: Darwinism -1-
The glorious irreducible complexity in the synthesis of a single protein The guardian: Darwinism in Britain has collapsed!
The idea that Darwin made an important scientific discovery after his voyages is a deception The idea that 'mutations cause evolution' is a falsehood
The idea that the 'coelacanth is an example of the transition from sea to land' is a fraud The ignored sickness: An unpredictable state of mind
The images visualized and dreams The importance of the intellectual struggle against Darwinism
The invalidity of the claims that the eye is not an irreducibly complex structure and that the eye evolved The invalidity of the claim that bacterial resistance to antibiotics is evidence of evolution
The invalidity of the claim that man's ancestors lived in caves The invalidity of the claim that mutations miraculously give rise to evolution
The invalidity of the claim that new species evolve every year The invalidity of the claim that the idea that whales evolved from bears did not originate with Darwin
The invalidity of the claim that there is chaos in the universe and the world The latest Darwinist manoeuvrings are of no avail as objections to Darwinism in Britain rise
The latest developments regarding Flores man The myth of bird evolution
The origins of superstitious religion of Darwinism The question Darwinism and materialism will never be able to answer: what is the origin of life?
The real face of Charles Darwin who is introduced to the public as a 'scientist' The Repairer DNA Precludes Evolutionists' Mutation Scenarios
The scientific collapse of materialism The theory of evolution: a unique deception in the history of the world
The transition to bipedalism deception The true facts about the fictitious 'missing link' Ida that Darwinists never mention
The truth that Darwinist bus posters confess: Darwinism = Atheism The Vatican conference is anti-democratic
The Vatican has surrendered to Darwinists The vestigial organ deception has once again been refuted by scientists
The wave-like properties of the electron and the scientific proof The widening genetic gap
Those who ascribe equals to Allah will encounter the horror in their minds in the hereafter To be dedicated to Dawkins
Unable to Account for a Single Protein, Darwinists Now Place Their Hopes in Fossilized Footprints USA - Slate Magazine: Meet Harun Yahya : the leading creationist in the Muslim world
USA - The Boston Globe: In the Muslim world, creationism is on the rise We challenge Dawkins to a discussion before the public
What Darwinists claimed, what happened What Darwinists said, what happened then
What will Dawkins have to say to this? Londoners say 'we support creation' Why are Darwinists reluctant to confront Mr. Adnan Oktar?
Why are Darwinists so determined to humiliate themselves? Why are Darwinists still resorting to false Dino-bird myths?
Why do Darwinists not give up? Why do defenders of creation who say the earth is 4.5 billion years old disturb Darwinists so much?
Why is anti-Darwinist activity so important? Yet another blow to the myth of vestigial organs

BookGlobal.Net

No comments:

Post a Comment